Pull request and review-request registration
For pull request and review-request registration, define the required context, classification rules, and duplicate or missing-data checks before work enters the operating queue.
FREE CLAUDE & CODEX PLUGIN TEMPLATE
A real SOT-based Code Review Management System PRD template connecting pull request and review-request registration, review status, comments, approvals, and change-history lookup, reviewer assignment, review, revision request, approval, and merge handling, review lead-time, participation, defect, and sla reporting.
View source on GitHub · MIT licensed
USE CASE
Teams designing an internal operations system for developer reviewing and merging code changes and engineering productivity lead and engineering manager
CONTENTS
VIBESPEC VIEWER
Each screen is generated from the public SOT included with this template.
Open this screen in the live demo
Open this screen in the live demo
Open this screen in the live demo
Open this screen in the live demo PRACTICAL GUIDE
This Code Review Management System connects pull request and review-request registration, review status, comments, approvals, and change-history lookup, reviewer assignment, review, revision request, approval, and merge handling, and review lead-time, participation, defect, and sla reporting in one SOT-based planning document. Use the complete HTML to review and share the plan, then adapt the SOT JSON with the VibeSpec plugin in Claude or Codex.
For pull request and review-request registration, define the required context, classification rules, and duplicate or missing-data checks before work enters the operating queue.
For review status, comments, approvals, and change-history lookup, keep status, owner, priority, and change history together so the team can find the complete operating context.
In reviewer assignment, review, revision request, approval, and merge handling, connect assignment, approval or rejection, exception handling, and completion confirmation as one accountable workflow.
Use review lead-time, participation, defect, and sla reporting to track due dates, bottlenecks, exceptions, and completion outcomes by team, period, and operating category.
Set the role-based access, audit history, notifications, and external-system boundaries that Code Review Management System needs to operate safely.
The download opens in a browser without setup. Compare the PRD, feature specification, screen structure, and user flow with the work your team does today.
Write down real user roles, required data, approval rules, exceptions, and success metrics. Start with the core flow from pull request and review-request registration through reviewer assignment, review, revision request, approval, and merge handling.
Attach the SOT JSON in Claude or Codex with the VibeSpec plugin and describe the change in plain language. VibeSpec keeps requirements, features, screens, and user flows connected.
Replace the template vocabulary, states, and classification with the terms your team uses. Keep pull request and review-request registration and review status, comments, approvals, and change-history lookup consistent.
Define who registers, reviews, approves, processes, and confirms completion, plus the conditions that trigger rejection or reprocessing in reviewer assignment, review, revision request, approval, and merge handling.
Decide what review lead-time, participation, defect, and sla reporting should measure, then connect any SSO, messaging, or adjacent-system integration to the related screens and user flow.
Create a separate Code Review Management System initiative for due-date alerts, owner assignment, approval reminders, and exception follow-up.
Before connecting Code Review Management System to source data or adjacent systems, define synchronization cadence, failure handling, access boundaries, and audit records.
Extend Code Review Management System with team, period, and category analysis plus action rules for deteriorating completion or service levels.
Adapt this Code Review Management System for our team. Ask about our user roles, states, required fields, and approval steps first, then update the requirements, screens, and user flows together.Reduce this Code Review Management System to an MVP that keeps pull request and review-request registration, review status, comments, approvals, and change-history lookup, and reviewer assignment, review, revision request, approval, and merge handling. Move automation and external integrations into separate initiatives.Create a separate initiative on top of this Code Review Management System for due-date alerts and automatic owner assignment. Keep the connection to the existing screens and user flow.Yes. The complete HTML opens in a browser for review and sharing. To adapt the plan, attach the SOT JSON to Claude or Codex with the VibeSpec plugin and describe the change in plain language.
It includes pull request and review-request registration, review status, comments, approvals, and change-history lookup, reviewer assignment, review, revision request, approval, and merge handling, and review lead-time, participation, defect, and sla reporting, plus foundations for access, audit history, notifications, and integrations.
The HTML is a complete planning document for reading and sharing. The SOT JSON is source data that VibeSpec can update while keeping requirements, features, screens, and user flows connected.
For a discrete capability such as automation, integration, or additional analytics, create and review a separate initiative before changing the product plan broadly.
WORKFLOW