1. Identify the version being reviewed
Choose an internal policy and name its owner, current approved version, and proposed revision. Decide how readers distinguish an approved document from a draft.
FREE CLAUDE & CODEX PLUGIN TEMPLATE
Define how documents move from registration through review, approval, version changes, and retention. This free document management PRD example helps your team agree the workflow before building a DMS or planning custom extensions.
Guide updated:
View source on GitHub · MIT licensed
USE CASE
Product managers, document owners, and developers planning a custom document management workflow or an extension to an existing DMS
CONTENTS
VIBESPEC VIEWER
Each screen is generated from the public SOT included with this template.
Open this screen in the live demo
Open this screen in the live demo
Open this screen in the live demo
Open this screen in the live demo PRACTICAL GUIDE
A list of vendor features does not explain how your team approves and maintains a document. Start with one document type, its owner, and the states it passes through. Use this planning example to compare the PRD with the feature specification, screen structure, and user flow. Review the HTML with document owners, then give the SOT JSON and agreed changes to VibeSpec. Evaluate vendors, storage infrastructure, and applicable retention obligations separately.
This proposed review exercise illustrates requirements to agree with your team. It is not a claim that the demo stores documents or enforces retention rules.
Choose an internal policy and name its owner, current approved version, and proposed revision. Decide how readers distinguish an approved document from a draft.
Suppose a reviewer rejects the new draft. Specify where the reason is recorded, who may revise it, and which version remains available to readers while review continues.
Decide who may approve, archive, or delete a version and which history must remain visible. Ask VibeSpec to add the agreed acceptance criteria; have responsible owners review retention requirements before implementation.
For document authoring and file registration, define the required context, classification rules, and duplicate or missing-data checks before work enters the operating queue.
For document, folder, version, owner, and approval-status lookup, keep status, owner, priority, and change history together so the team can find the complete operating context.
In review, approval, version management, and retention handling, connect assignment, approval or rejection, exception handling, and completion confirmation as one accountable workflow.
Use document freshness, approval delay, and retention-policy reporting to track due dates, bottlenecks, exceptions, and completion outcomes by team, period, and operating category.
Set the role-based access, audit history, notifications, and external-system boundaries that Document Management System needs to operate safely.
The download opens in a browser without setup. Compare the PRD, feature specification, screen structure, and user flow with the work your team does today.
Write down real user roles, required data, approval rules, exceptions, and success metrics. Start with the core flow from document authoring and file registration through review, approval, version management, and retention handling.
Attach the SOT JSON in Claude or Codex with the VibeSpec plugin and describe the change in plain language. VibeSpec keeps requirements, features, screens, and user flows connected.
Replace the template vocabulary, states, and classification with the terms your team uses. Keep document authoring and file registration and document, folder, version, owner, and approval-status lookup consistent.
Define who registers, reviews, approves, processes, and confirms completion, plus the conditions that trigger rejection or reprocessing in review, approval, version management, and retention handling.
Decide what document freshness, approval delay, and retention-policy reporting should measure, then connect any SSO, messaging, or adjacent-system integration to the related screens and user flow.
Create a separate Document Management System initiative for due-date alerts, owner assignment, approval reminders, and exception follow-up.
Before connecting Document Management System to source data or adjacent systems, define synchronization cadence, failure handling, access boundaries, and audit records.
Extend Document Management System with team, period, and category analysis plus action rules for deteriorating completion or service levels.
Adapt this Document Management System for our team. Ask about our user roles, states, required fields, and approval steps first, then update the requirements, screens, and user flows together.Reduce this Document Management System to an MVP that keeps document authoring and file registration, document, folder, version, owner, and approval-status lookup, and review, approval, version management, and retention handling. Move automation and external integrations into separate initiatives.Create a separate initiative on top of this Document Management System for due-date alerts and automatic owner assignment. Keep the connection to the existing screens and user flow.Yes. The complete HTML opens in a browser for review and sharing. To adapt the plan, attach the SOT JSON to Claude or Codex with the VibeSpec plugin and describe the change in plain language.
It includes document authoring and file registration, document, folder, version, owner, and approval-status lookup, review, approval, version management, and retention handling, and document freshness, approval delay, and retention-policy reporting, plus foundations for access, audit history, notifications, and integrations.
The HTML is a complete planning document for reading and sharing. The SOT JSON is source data that VibeSpec can update while keeping requirements, features, screens, and user flows connected.
For a discrete capability such as automation, integration, or additional analytics, create and review a separate initiative before changing the product plan broadly.
It is a PRD and functional requirements planning example for a document workflow. It does not score vendors or certify regulatory compliance. If you are selecting a DMS, assess supplier capabilities, migration, storage, contracts, and relevant obligations separately. The HTML demo displays the plan, not a live document repository.
WORKFLOW